{"id":810,"date":"2022-11-02T16:47:57","date_gmt":"2022-11-02T15:47:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/?p=810"},"modified":"2022-11-02T16:47:59","modified_gmt":"2022-11-02T15:47:59","slug":"appel-a-contribution-au-dela-des-encyclopedies-canoniques-parents-atypiques-enfants-rares-rursusspicae","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/2022\/11\/02\/appel-a-contribution-au-dela-des-encyclopedies-canoniques-parents-atypiques-enfants-rares-rursusspicae\/","title":{"rendered":"Appel \u00e0 contribution | Au-del\u00e0 des encyclop\u00e9dies canoniques : parents atypiques, enfants rares \u2013 RursusSpicae"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>English version&nbsp;: Beyond standard encyclopedias : untypical models and original offspring<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Several compilations of knowledge of the 13<sup>th<\/sup>&nbsp;century have benefited, from the end of the 1970s onwards, from numerous studies and gained a recognition that has made them part of the canon of \u00ab\u00a0encyclopedias\u00a0\u00bb, in particular those of Alexander Nequam, Thomas of Cantimpr\u00e9, Bartholomaeus Anglicus and Vincent of Beauvais. Some derivatives works, recompiled or moralized in the last centuries of the Middle Ages, are now quite well known as well. The works of Honorius Augustodunensis, Daniel de Morley, Gr\u00e9goire de Montesacro, etc. are yet seen as the early days of the \u00ab&nbsp;Golden Age of encyclopedias\u00a0\u00bb. This issue of&nbsp;<em>RursuSpicae<\/em>&nbsp;would like to open the field to less known aspects of these encyclopaedia or to other encyclopaedic works, less studied or more confidential. For the gaze of researchers has recently moved beyond this first restricted circle of widely distributed encyclopedias and their replicas, to focus on compilations on Nature that are sometimes less typical, which were the immediate sources of the encyclopaedias of the \u00ab\u00a0Golden Age\u00a0\u00bb; various naturalistic, philosophical or lexical compilations gradually emerged from the dust of the manuscripts; an unsuspected type of source \u2014if not a neglected prototype\u2014, namely the \u201ccollections of properties\u00a0\u00bb, was brought to light; series of organized glosses were unearthed that constituted the first commentaries to the&nbsp;<em>philosophi moderni<\/em>&nbsp;and nourished the encyclopaedic knowledge of the first circle. In order to make new discoveries about the birth of a medieval genre and its contribution to the diffusion of the science of its time, it is necessary to deepen all these new avenues, to extend the investigations to encyclopaedias of the late 12th and early 13th centuries, partly or completely unpublished, sometimes preserved in a single copy, or to compilations hybridized with exegetical commentaries or lexicological works.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Contributions for this issue sent to the editorial staff of RursuSpicae will be peer-reviewed.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Version fran\u00e7aise&nbsp;: Au-del\u00e0 des encyclop\u00e9dies canoniques&nbsp;: parents atypiques, enfants rares<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Plusieurs compilations m\u00e9di\u00e9vales du savoir ont b\u00e9n\u00e9fici\u00e9, \u00e0 partir de la fin des ann\u00e9es 1970, d\u2019un travail d\u2019analyse et d\u2019une reconnaissance qui les ont fait entrer dans le canon des \u00ab&nbsp;encyclop\u00e9dies&nbsp;\u00bb, en particulier celles d\u2019Alexandre Nequam, de Thomas de Cantimpr\u00e9, de Barth\u00e9lemy l\u2019Anglais et de Vincent de Beauvais&nbsp;; leurs \u00ab&nbsp;produits d\u00e9riv\u00e9s&nbsp;\u00bb recompil\u00e9s ou moralis\u00e9s dans les derniers si\u00e8cles du Moyen \u00e2ge, sont d\u00e9sormais assez bien connus eux aussi, et les premiers balbutiements de l\u2019\u00ab&nbsp;\u00e2ge d\u2019or des encyclop\u00e9dies&nbsp;\u00bb furent reconnus chez Honorius Augustodunensis, Daniel de Morley, Gr\u00e9goire de Montesacro, etc. Ce num\u00e9ro de&nbsp;<em>RursuSpicae<\/em>&nbsp;voudrait ouvrir le champ sur d\u2019autres \u0153uvres encyclop\u00e9diques, peu \u00e9tudi\u00e9es ou plus confidentielles. Car le regard des chercheurs s\u2019est depuis peu port\u00e9 au-del\u00e0 de ce premier cercle restreint d\u2019encyclop\u00e9dies tr\u00e8s diffus\u00e9es, et de ses r\u00e9pliques, pour se poser sur des compilations sur la nature parfois moins typiques, comme le&nbsp;<em>Livre de Sydrac<\/em>, ou comme le&nbsp;<em>Liber rerum&nbsp;<\/em>ou l\u2019Experimentator, qui furent les sources imm\u00e9diates des encyclop\u00e9dies de \u00ab&nbsp;l\u2019\u00e2ge d\u2019or&nbsp;\u00bb&nbsp;; diverses compilations naturalistes, philosophiques ou lexicales \u00e9mergent peu \u00e0 peu de la poussi\u00e8re des manuscrits&nbsp;; on a m\u00eame sorti de l\u2019ombre un type de source insoup\u00e7onn\u00e9 ou de prototype n\u00e9glig\u00e9 que sont les \u00ab&nbsp;recueils de propri\u00e9t\u00e9s&nbsp;\u00bb&nbsp;; on a mis au jour des gloses organis\u00e9es qui constituent les premiers commentaires aux&nbsp;<em>philosophi moderni&nbsp;<\/em>et ont nourri le savoir encyclop\u00e9dique du premier cercle.&nbsp;Pour faire \u00e9merger de nouvelles d\u00e9couvertes sur la naissance d\u2019un genre m\u00e9di\u00e9val et sa contribution \u00e0 la diffusion de la science de son temps, il est n\u00e9cessaire d\u2019approfondir toutes ces nouvelles pistes, d\u2019\u00e9tendre aussi les investigations aux encyclop\u00e9dies de la fin du 12<sup>e<\/sup>&nbsp;si\u00e8cle et du d\u00e9but du 13<sup>e<\/sup>&nbsp;si\u00e8cle en partie ou compl\u00e8tement in\u00e9dites, parfois conserv\u00e9es en un seul exemplaire, ou aux compilations hybrid\u00e9es avec le commentaire ex\u00e9g\u00e9tique ou l\u2019ouvrage lexicologique.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Les contributions sur ce th\u00e8me envoy\u00e9es \u00e0 la r\u00e9daction de&nbsp;RursuSpicae&nbsp;feront l\u2019objet d\u2019une \u00e9valuation par peer-review.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>English version&nbsp;: Beyond standard encyclopedias : untypical models and original offspring Several compilations of knowledge of the 13th&nbsp;century have benefited, from the end of the 1970s onwards, from numerous studies and gained a recognition that has made them part of the canon of \u00ab\u00a0encyclopedias\u00a0\u00bb, in particular those of Alexander Nequam, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":811,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,15],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/810"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=810"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/810\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":812,"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/810\/revisions\/812"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/811"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}