![](\"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2016\/10\/arton136.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Syriac and Arabic zoological literature (8-15 cent. AD). Studies on Arabic transmission of Greek zoology have mainly focused on Aristotelian tradition (which appears, by the way, to be often indirect). But the influence of Greek zoological texts, usually through Syriac translations, goes far beyond the case of Aristotle. We would like to consider more precisely in oriental zoological literature the echoes of, or references to, Late antiquity Greek texts, among which Timotheos of Gaza (labelled as T\u00eem\u00fbn\u00eey\u00fbs, T\u00eem\u00fbs\u00fbs, Atm\u00een\u00fbs, etc.) probably plays an important role (Kruk 2001: 357), albeit not exclusive. This meeting is conceived as a continuation of investigations stimulated by the works of Ullmann (1972) and Sezgin (1970, 2000), and led by A.Z. Iskandar (1981), R. Kruk (2001), and T. Buquet (2014), in particular on the treatise of al-Marwazi. The recent development of new digital resources and researches (e.g. for the Al-Kitab na\u2019t Hayawan by Contadini 2012) give the opportuny to better understand the nature and extent of this influence, which can also improve our knowledge of Greek authors of this period, who have escaped attention or lack of Greek manuscript transmission. 4 novembre 2016 \u2022 MSHS, SJA3, Amphi 31 Syriac and Arabic zoological literature (8-15 cent. AD). Studies on Arabic transmission of Greek zoology have mainly focused on Aristotelian tradition (which appears, by the way, to be often indirect). But the influence of Greek zoological texts, usually through Syriac translations, goes […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=276"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":422,"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/276\/revisions\/422"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=276"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=276"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=276"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nL\u2019objet de la journ\u00e9e est d\u2019identifier, mettre en lumi\u00e8re et discuter les emprunts possibles ou av\u00e9r\u00e9s dans les trait\u00e9s syriaques et arabes des sources zoologiques grecques. Les \u00e9tudes sur la transmission de la zoologie grecque se sont concentr\u00e9es sur la tradition aristot\u00e9licienne, qui est souvent indirecte. Mais l\u2019influence de textes zoologiques grecs, en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral par l\u2019interm\u00e9diaire de traductions syriaques, d\u00e9passe largement le seul cas du Stagirite. Il s\u2019agira d\u2019\u00e9tudier la pr\u00e9sence d\u2019autres auteurs, tardifs, parmi lesquels Timoth\u00e9e de Gaza (T\u00eem\u00fbn\u00eey\u00fbs, T\u00eem\u00fbs\u00fbs, Atm\u00een\u00fbs, etc.) occupe une place sans doute importante (Kruk 2001 : 357), bien qu\u2019elle ne soit probablement pas exclusive. Cette journ\u00e9e s\u2019inscrit dans le prolongement des enqu\u00eates engag\u00e9es, en particulier \u00e0 partir des travaux de Ullmann (1972) et Sezgin (1970, 2000), par A.Z. Iskandar (1981), R. Kruk (2001), et T. Buquet (2014), en particulier sur le trait\u00e9 d\u2019 al-Marwaz\u012b. Le d\u00e9veloppement des outils et des recherches (voir sur le Kit\u0101b Na\u2019t Al-Hayaw\u0101n Contadini 2012) rend cette rencontre opportune pour mieux cerner la nature et l\u2019\u00e9tendue de cette influence, qui peut enrichir \u00e9galement notre connaissance des auteurs grecs peu ou mal conserv\u00e9s.
\nProgram<\/a>
\n![\"capture_d_e_cran_2016-10-03_a_14.50.20.png\"](\"https:\/\/www.cepam.cnrs.fr\/sites\/zoomathia\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2016\/10\/capture_d_e_cran_2016-10-03_a_14.50.20.png\")
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"